I think you mis-understand the point(s) I'm making. And in fact, your answers gives aways the telling bias that has chained the ankles of many.

1. Intelligent design does not equate to life being 'created'. Higher intelligent life could have nudged ours along just as we have nudged silicon life (computers and AI) along.

2. Creator does not equate to god(s). Having the ability to make this or some part of this universe does not imply intent or purpose for intelligent life. By no leap of argument can one suggest that a creator is benevolent or personal; in fact, the evidence overwhelmingly suggest otherwise.

3. God(s) does not equate to worship. Even if there were god(s), why the need for worship? What benefit does worship bring us. The observable evidence suggest that there is very little benefit, if any.

Ultimately, it would appear that some men (women) are so inclined to live their lives in prostration, and they will continue their search not for truth, but rather for subservience.